ISSN (O): 3049-3331Frequency: BimonthlyLanguages: English, Hindi and other languagesDOI Prefix: 10.64127
editor@shodhpith.com+91 94585 04123
SIMRJ logoShodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research JournalInternational Open Access, Peer-reviewed & Refereed JournalISSN: 3049-3331 (Online)DOI Prefix: 10.64127

Official DOI landing page

Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood

Department of English, Siddharth University Kapilvastu, Siddharthnagar.

JournalSIMRJ
Volume / Issue2 / 1
Pages7–12
Published10 Jan 2026
Paper IDSIMRJ21JF26002
Views / Downloads6 / 7

Article summary

Abstract

The feminist dimensions of The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood, examining how the novel interrogates patriarchy, bodily autonomy, language, and resistance within the dystopian theocracy of Gilead. Through a feminist theoretical framework, the study analyzes the regime’s systematic control over women’s identities, reproduction, literacy, and social mobility. Gilead’s hierarchical caste system dividing women into Handmaids, Wives, Marthas, and Aunts demonstrates the politicization of motherhood and the reduction of women to reproductive instruments. Drawing upon historical materialist feminism, radical feminism, and intersectional theory, the paper investigates how the state regulates female bodies through surveillance, linguistic manipulation, and institutionalized sexual coercion. The erasure of personal names, restriction of reading and writing, and the normalization of reproductive exploitation illustrate how discourse operates as a mechanism of power. At the same time, the narrative foregrounds subtle and overt forms of resistance, including acts of memory, storytelling, female solidarity, and bodily defiance. By focusing on Offred’s first-person narration, the study highlights how voice itself becomes a feminist act of reclamation. The novel ultimately reimagines feminism not as a fixed ideology but as an evolving struggle shaped by class, gender, and socio-political context. Reading The Handmaid’s Tale through feminist theory underscores its enduring relevance to contemporary debates surrounding reproductive rights, state control, and women’s agency

Keywords

Feminist TheoryPatriarchyReproductive ControlBodily AutonomySurveillanceLanguage and PowerFemale ResistanceDystopian Fiction.

Citation record

How to cite this article

Hriday Kant Pandey (2026). Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002

Hriday Kant Pandey. “Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood.” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2026, pp. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002

Hriday Kant Pandey. “Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood.” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2, no. 1 (2026): 7–12. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002

Hriday Kant Pandey (2026) ‘Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood’, Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), pp. 7–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002.

Hriday Kant Pandey, “Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood,” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2026. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002.

Hriday Kant Pandey. Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2026;2(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002.

Hriday Kant Pandey. Feminist Theory in the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2026, 2 (1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2026v2i1002.

Record provenance

Publication history

Received06 Nov 2025
Accepted15 Dec 2025
Published10 Jan 2026
Record versionVersion of Record

Research integrity

Declarations

Funding

No separate funding declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.

Conflict of Interest

No separate conflict-of-interest declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.

Ethical Approval

No separate ethical approval statement was available in the verified source record; the article and journal policies apply.

Data Availability

No separate data-availability statement was available in the verified source record; contact the author(s) or editorial office where appropriate.

Author Contributions

No separate author-contribution statement was available in the verified source record; authorship follows the published article record.

AI-use Declaration

No separate AI-use declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal AI-use policy applies.

Editorial record

Publisher's Note

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication does not imply endorsement by the journal, editorial board or publisher. Responsibility for accuracy, originality and integrity remains with the author(s). Readers should independently evaluate and verify information before application or citation.

Open-access terms

License & Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Author(s). This work is published by Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

Discover more

Related articles