ISSN (O): 3049-3331Frequency: BimonthlyLanguages: English, Hindi and other languagesDOI Prefix: 10.64127
editor@shodhpith.com+91 94585 04123
SIMRJ logoShodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research JournalInternational Open Access, Peer-reviewed & Refereed JournalISSN: 3049-3331 (Online)DOI Prefix: 10.64127

Official DOI landing page

Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India

Sunil KumarCorresponding Author

Research Scholar, Department of Law, C. M. P. Degree College, University of Allahabad

JournalSIMRJ
Volume / Issue1 / 4
Pages109–113
Published14 Jul 2025
Paper IDSIMRJ14JA250016
Views / Downloads9 / 3

Article summary

Abstract

This research paper examines how traditional and indigenous knowledge (TIK) receives protection within India's Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) legal structure. The study emphasizes the critical value of ancestral wisdom while conducting a comprehensive analysis of regulatory mechanisms governing its safeguarding through diverse intellectual property legislation. Ancestral wisdom typically transfers orally across successive generations via narrative traditions, cultural performances, ceremonial practices, musical expressions, and recreational activities. While the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) provides a general characterization of ancestral knowledge, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) lacks a formal definitional framework. Both the United Nations (UN) and WIPO recognize that indigenous wisdom includes traditional cultural expressions (TCE) such as linguistic systems, oral histories, choreographic arts, recreational pursuits, mythological narratives, aesthetic patterns, visual creativity, and structural designs. This research illuminates challenges and opportunities in protecting TIK while ensuring its conservation, recognition, and fair utilization through framework analysis.

Keywords

Ancestral wisdomIndigenous knowledge systemsIntellectual Property RightsWIPOTraditional Cultural Expressions (TCE).

Citation record

How to cite this article

Sunil Kumar (2025). Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(4), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015

Sunil Kumar. “Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India.” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, 2025, pp. 109–113. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015

Sunil Kumar. “Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India.” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 1, no. 4 (2025): 109–113. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015

Sunil Kumar (2025) ‘Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India’, Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(4), pp. 109–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015.

Sunil Kumar, “Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India,” Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 109–113, 2025. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015.

Sunil Kumar. Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2025;1(4):109–113. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015.

Sunil Kumar. Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge as Intellectual Property: A Legal Perspective on Protection and Enforcement in India. Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2025, 1 (4), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.64127/Shodhpith.2025v1i40015.

Record provenance

Publication history

Published14 Jul 2025
Record versionVersion of Record

Research integrity

Declarations

Funding

No separate funding declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.

Conflict of Interest

No separate conflict-of-interest declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.

Ethical Approval

No separate ethical approval statement was available in the verified source record; the article and journal policies apply.

Data Availability

No separate data-availability statement was available in the verified source record; contact the author(s) or editorial office where appropriate.

Author Contributions

No separate author-contribution statement was available in the verified source record; authorship follows the published article record.

AI-use Declaration

No separate AI-use declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal AI-use policy applies.

Editorial record

Publisher's Note

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication does not imply endorsement by the journal, editorial board or publisher. Responsibility for accuracy, originality and integrity remains with the author(s). Readers should independently evaluate and verify information before application or citation.

Open-access terms

License & Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Author(s). This work is published by Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.

Discover more

Related articles