Current Issue Details
Vol.: 1
Issue: 3
May- June 2025
Submit Paper Online
Paper Template Format
Undertaking Form
Copyright Form
Author Guidelines
Research Area
Publication Fee
Peer Review Process
Privacy Statement
Reviewer Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Plagiarism Policy
Open Access Policies

Peer Review Process

This is informed to all the writers and readers that “Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal” is being declared as a “Peer Reviewed Journal” by constituting a Peer Review Committee with eminent scholars and educationists to improve the quality and maintain the plagiarism in the field of Research by reviewing the articles before publish. The reviewing system is double-blind. Peer review is the most important quality control measure for any academic journal. This process involves an analysis of the scholarly work from each perspective, including writing, technical content, documentation and its impact on or relevance to the discipline by Subject experts in the relevant fields. First of all, the research paper is examined by our editorial board. The editor's office first checks each manuscript for plagiarism. After going through this process, articles that are found suitable for review are sent to two related subject experts in the area of the research paper. If any kind of correction is required then it is sent back to the author for correction. Acceptance or rejection notification will be sent to all authors through e-mail within 2-7 days after submitting paper. Accepted paper will be published within 7-10 days after submitting all necessary documents.

Guidelines for Peer Review Process

Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal is a reputed peer-reviewed, refereed and multidisciplinary research journal committed to promoting high-quality research and maintaining academic integrity. The journal follows a rigorous transparent review process in compliance with the guidelines to ensure the credibility and reliability of published research. This transparent review policy provides clear guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors, ensuring fairness, objectivity, and a standardized evaluation process for all submitted manuscripts.

Purpose of the Review Process

Stages of the Peer Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes a preliminary editorial assessment to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and quality standards. This stage includes:

  • ■ Relevance Check – Whether the manuscript aligns with the scope of the journal.
  • ■ Plagiarism Screening – Each submission is checked using advanced plagiarism detection software.
    • ■ Quality of Research – Evaluation of research originality, novelty, and academic significance.
  • ■ Language and Formatting – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.

Manuscripts failing to meet these basic criteria may be returned for revision or rejected outright before being sent for peer review.


2. Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Shodhpith Journal follows a Double-Blind Peer Review system, which ensures that:

  • ■ Reviewers do not know the identity of the author(s).
  • ■ Authors do not know the identity of the reviewers

Each manuscript is assigned to at least two independent subject experts based on their area of specialization. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:

  • 1. Originality and Novelty – Whether the manuscript aligns with the scope of the journal.
  • 2. Methodological Rigor – Each submission is checked using advanced plagiarism detection software.
  • 3. Accuracy of Results – Evaluation of research originality, novelty, and academic significance.
  • 4. Relevance of References – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.
  • 5. Language and Presentation – Ensuring clarity, coherence, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines.

Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations, ensuring a high level of academic scrutiny and integrity.

3. Reviewer Comments and Revision Process

Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes a preliminary editorial assessment to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and quality standards. This stage includes:

  • ■ After the peer review process, the authors receive detailed feedback with suggested revisions.
  • ■ Authors are expected to incorporate these revisions and submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeline.
  • ■ If necessary, the revised manuscript may be sent back to the reviewers for a second round of evaluation.

The revision process ensures that all research papers published in the journal maintain the highest academic and ethical standards.

4. Final Decision by Editorial Board

The Editorial Board makes the final decision on manuscript acceptance based on:

  • 1. Reviewers’ Recommendations – Final judgment from expert reviewers.
  • 2. Editorial Assessment – Further scrutiny of language, coherence, and research contribution.
  • 3. Compliance with Journal Guidelines – Ensuring adherence to journal policies.

The manuscript may be:

  • ■ Accepted – If it meets all quality and ethical standards.
  • ■ Accepted with Minor/Major Revisions – If improvements are required.
    • ■ Rejected – If it fails to meet the required criteria.

Transparency and Ethical Standards

Shodhpith International Multidisciplinary Research Journal adheres to the ethical guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the guidlines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability in research publication.

1. Plagiarism and Originality Check
  • ⇒ Every manuscript undergoes plagiarism screening using advanced detection tools
  • ⇒ Manuscripts with more than 10% similarity are automatically rejected or returned for revision.
2. Conflict of Interest Policy
  • ⇒ Reviewers and editors must disclose any potential conflict of interest before accepting a manuscript for review.
  • ⇒ Any bias or undue influence in the review process is strictly prohibited.
3. Reviewers and Editorial Board Accountability
  • ⇒ Reviewers and Editorial Board Accountability
  • ⇒ The editorial board ensures that decisions are made solely on the merit and quality of the research.
  • ⇒ Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback and maintain confidentiality.